Appearance
Writing a good brief
Why it matters
The copilot is only as good as what you ask. A vague request gets a reasonable guess. A clear brief gets a design you can defend.
The five things a good brief says
- The shell. Building size, clear height, column grid.
- The storage target. How many positions, of what type, how high.
- The flow. Where goods come in and leave. Which wall the docks are on.
- The support spaces. Staging and dispatch floors, offices, charging, amenities.
- The constraints. The forklift and aisle width, keep-outs, anything the site forces.
A brief that works
Design a distribution centre in a 120 × 100 m shed, 12 m clear, columns on a 12 × 10 m grid.
Storage: about 4 500 selective pallet positions, 4 levels, counterbalance trucks with 3.8 m aisles. A forward pick face of about 200 positions near dispatch.
Flow: three receiving doors on the south wall at the west end, six dispatch doors on the south wall at the east end. A receiving floor in front of the receiving doors and a dispatch floor in front of the dispatch doors.
Support: an office for 8 people near the receiving doors, a packing bench between the pick face and dispatch.
Check the design when you are done and fix anything major.
On a brief like this, the copilot plans the whole floor first (a block plan), then builds it block by block, then measures it.
Tips
- Give numbers. "About 4 500 positions" beats "lots of storage".
- Name the wall. "Docks on the south wall" removes a guess.
- Name things. "A zone called Reserve" lets you refer to it later: "make Reserve 5 m shorter".
- One idea per follow-up. "Now add a cross aisle every 8 bays in Reserve."
- Ask it to check. "Check the design" runs the same measurements it uses on itself.
- Ask what it assumed. "What did you assume?" gets a straight list.
- Use memory for habits. "Remember that this client always uses 3.8 m aisles."
Asking for a what-if
The copilot can run the whole comparison workflow in one message:
Clone this scenario as '+25 % demand', raise the clone's two inbound truck profiles and its Interstate order type by 25 %, run the clone for 7 days with 3 replications on seed 42 and racks 30 % full, then compare it with the baseline. Report the headline differences with their 95 % bands and say which are real.
In the demo, that took eight tool calls and under a minute. A scaled profile is noted on the profile itself ("scaled x1.25 by the copilot") so a second request does not scale it twice.
To compare again later without changing anything, say exactly that: "Compare the two existing runs. Change nothing, run nothing."
When it goes wrong
- It refused something. Read the quoted reason. It nearly always names the fix: a distance, a level count, a zone that is in the way.
- It ran out of steps. Click Continue.
- It is heading the wrong way. Type a correction while it runs, or Stop and rephrase.
- The result is wrong. Say what was wrong, specifically: "Reserve overlaps the office, shorten it by 6 m". The copilot's changes are not on the editor's undo list, so ask it to remove what it built, or delete it yourself. For a big experiment, clone the scenario first.
Words you just learned
Brief · block plan.